Another Misbehaved CEO at Best Buy?


By EconMatters

I’m not sure what’s up with some of these big corporate CEOs keep making the news headline for having “inappropriate relationship” with a female employee.  The latest episode of high-profile executive resignation (read: fired) came from Best Buy (BBY), the electronic retail giant.

Best Buy announced in the morning of Tuesday, April 10 that CEO Brian Dunn’s resignation was the result of a “mutual agreement that it was time for new leadership to address the challenges that face the company.”  The real story behind Dunns’ abrupt departure was only revealed two days later by Best Buy’s hometown newspaper, the Minneapolis Star Tribune–Best Buy’s board of directors is investigating allegations that Dunns misused company resources in the course of an inappropriate relationship with a female employee.

If this sounds familiar, it is because Mark Hurd, the former CEO of Hewlett Packard (HPQ), was ousted under somewhat similar circumstances just last August.  Mark Hurd was dubbed as one of the best CEOs in the country that had turned HP around into one of the world’s biggest technology companies.  However, Hurd’s drastic cost cutting measures, including 15,200 job cuts, also had alienated many employees as well as board members, which is likely one of the contributing factors to his eventual dismissal.

Brian Dunn, on the other hand, is supposedly well-liked within the company having worked his way up from the sales floor to the C-Suite during his 28 years with Best Buy.  However, the company stocks have declined almost 43% since Dunn took over as the Director and CEO in June of 2009, and has been struggling with losing sales to online rivals like Amazon and NewEgg.  Dunn and Best Buy’s board have been criticized for not doing enough to cut costs, and increase its online presence.  Not even Dunn’s plan to close 50 of its 1,100 large U.S. stores and to expand its smaller Best Buy Mobile has managed to inspire investors.

So it looks like Dunn’s days of CEO are already numbered, and this incident was just the last straw for the company board to move up the CEO replacement timeline.

Some believe Best Buy’s outdated big box store model is the culprit of the company’s inability to compete with online retailers like Amazon.  However, big box stores do serve a different target audience from online shopping sites.  Big stores like Walmart (WMT) may still compete effectively with the likes of Amazon with proper store location, space utilization, good supply chain management and customer service.  Ultimately, as noted in our previous analysis, Best Buy fails miserably compared even to big box peers including Home Depot (HD), and the main problem has to do with its poor corporate and store management, terrible customer service and lack of a focused leadership and strategy.

Chart Source: Yahoo Finance, April 14, 2012

The difference between HP and Best Buy is that Hurd was a successful CEO leaving HP at a much stronger position to deal with an executive turnover than Dunn had with Best Buy.  But even so, HP stocks have not regained the lost ground after Hurd’s exit eight months ago (see chart above).  Right now, Wall Street analysts are focusing on the search for Dunn’s replacement. Needless to say, it will be a monumental uphill battle to even halt the current downward spiral of Best buy no matter who takes the helm.      

Further Reading:
Amazon vs. Walmart: Let The Battle Being
How Home Depot Delivers Where Competitors Fail

© EconMatters All Rights Reserved | Facebook | Twitter | Post Alert | Kindle

Read more posts on EconMatters »

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Go to Source

Daily ETF Roundup: VXX Recovers As Market Tank, XLF Leads Losses

It seems that yesterday’s rumors of strong China GDP growth were merely that, rumors. GDP sank to 8.1%, the weakest in three years, causing stocks to erase Thursday’s bull run as volatility spiked yet again, marking one of the more active weeks in recent memory. The Dow lost over 130 points while the S&P surrendered nearly 1.3%, all of this coming even after Google, JP Morgan, and Wells Fargo surpassed earnings expectations. While many investors had hoped for earnings season to be the main focus of the next few weeks, global issues concerning the euro debt crisis and now China’s lagging growth is creating a major cause for concern [see also Doomsday Special: 7 Hard Asset Investments You Can Hold in Your Hand].

Gold was one of the hardest hit assets on the day, as it sank 25 points, creating a major opportunity for gold bugs around the world. Crude oil also suffered during the week-ending session, as a barrel of crude saw its price dip by 77 cents. Crude has been stuck in a range-bound rut for several weeks now, leading to a fair amount of speculation as to where the commodity will be headed next. With yet another unstable week to put in the books, Q2 is shaping up to fall well short of its predecessor and may crush investor optimism to boot. For now, we outline two of the most significant ETF movers on the day to keep traders up to date with all of the happenings around the financial world [see also Does GLD Really Hold Gold, Or is it a Scam?].

One of the biggest ETF winners came from none other than the S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (VXX), which sank by more than 8% yesterday. Today, however, this ETN was able to jump by about 5.4% as markets gave in to major selling pressures. Roughly 6% of the S&P 500 has reported earnings thus far, with over 75% of them being positive, but that has not been enough to overcome fears of European yields and a slowing global economy. VXX will continue to prey on markets for as long as instability lasts so keep an eye on this fund in the coming weeks as it can be a vital trading instrument.

 

One of the biggest ETF losers came from the Financial Select Sector SPDR (XLF), which sank by 2.3% on the day. XLF’s losses come as a frustrating result as JPM and WFC, both of whom beat the Street with their earnings, are among the top ten holdings of the fund. Still, the massive sell-off in this ETF was likely due to euro fears, as banks and the financial sector as a whole are easily spooked by news concerning debt issues. XLF traded 92 million shares on the day and has a year-to-date performance of approximately 17% [see also 4 Sector ETFs Up Over 20% YTD].

 

Disclosure: No positions at time of writing.

Click here to read the original article on ETFdb.com.

Read more posts on ETF Database »

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Go to Source

Could Gold Rise on One Country’s Meltdown?

Gold is ending the week doing a little more backing and filling. After yesterday’s run-up, the spot price has pulled back to $1,665.

$2,000 looks far off in the distance. To say nothing of last September’s $1,900 high.

Then again, it could happen with the snap of a finger.

“A push on toward $2,000 is definitely on the cards before the year is out,” says Philip Klapwijk, “although a clear breach of that mark is arguably a more likely event for the first half of next year.”

Mr. Klapwijk is global head of metals analytics at the consultancy Thomson Reuters GFMS. The catalyst for $2,000 might well be, in his estimation, Spain. A meltdown there — coupled with continuing strong demand from China — could give gold a whole new “safe haven” glow.

That said, he also sees a short-term dip to the year-end 2011 level of $1,550 within a couple of months. You’ve been warned.

“U.S. investors might sleep better at night with an allocation to gold in the face of continued negative real interest rates,” says U.S. Global Investors chief and Vancouver stalwart Frank Holmes.

“The chart below shows how gold has historically climbed when interest rates fell below 0%, with a ‘strong correlation from 1977-84, and again recently when rates turned negative in early 2008,’ according to Desjardins Capital Markets.”

The blue line on the chart is the very definition of “financial repression” — interest rates held below the rate of inflation. And the red line is how you combat it.

Keeping the faith with bullion is one thing. Keeping the faith with stocks has been, well, more of a challenge.

The HUI index of major gold stocks has bounced off lows hit earlier this week. Cold comfort in light of the fact the index sits where it did in August 2010. Or for that matter, November 2009.

“‘Cheap gold stock’ is a redundancy these days,” says Chris Mayer, “as nearly all gold stocks look cheap. While the gold price has held steady, gold stocks have lagged it. In March, that gap was the widest it’s been in the last 12 months.”

“Gold stocks trade at only half of their historical multiples of the last dozen years,” Chris goes on. “Yet gold miners enjoy the highest profit margins and cash flows they’ve had in decades.”

What gives? “Gold management teams are usually lame. All they want to do is take what they earn and put it back into the ground to find more gold. It doesn’t matter if it makes sense to do that or not. Or maybe they blow the money on an expensive acquisition. Shareholders are often an afterthought. One way you can see this is to look at dividends paid. Only technology stocks pay out less of their earnings to shareholders.”

“Many analysts,” adds another Vancouver favorite, Rick Rule, “myself prominently among them, were dismayed at the gold mining industries’ abysmal corporate performance during the last decade.”

But this is starting to change. “Even as the [gold] equities prices continue to decline,” says Rick, “corporate performance is increasing, and increasing dramatically.

“A cursory look at producers’ income statements tells a dramatic story: Earnings and cash generation, on a per share basis, are increasing in dramatic fashion. Capital expenditures are increasingly funded with internally generated cash, rather than equity issuances or debt.”

Some producers are even — gasp — paying a dividend. Newmont is raising its dividend as the price of gold rises.

So keep the faith, Mr. Rule advises: “Recognize that markets work, but only in the longer term. If you can’t handle that, find another avocation. The cure for low prices are low prices; the cure for high prices are high prices. In order to sell high, you must buy low.”

Dave Gonigam
for The Daily Reckoning

Could Gold Rise on One Country’s Meltdown? originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas. Recently Agora Financial released a video titled “What is Fracking?“.

Read more posts on The Daily Reckoning »

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Go to Source

The Rising Price of a Falling Dollar

Do you know why oil and prices are moving sharply higher? Some blame the oil companies, charging they are manipulating prices. Others cite US sanctions on Iran and the threat of a military encounter that would disrupt the flow of oil from the Middle East.

Speculators, too are blamed for ostensibly bidding up the price of oil. In the political arena, President Obama is taking credit for increased domestic oil production even as his critics point out the slow pace of drilling permits issued by his Administration soon will hamper additional increases in the US oil production.

Yet, the basic reason for higher energy prices is being overlooked, even though it is right before our eyes: Oil prices are up because the value of the dollar is down. Our common sense hides this source of higher prices because we view the dollar as fixed, and prices as moving. News reports explain the sharp rise in consumer prices in February were caused by higher energy and food prices, implying that higher prices cause inflation. Of course, higher prices do not cause inflation. Higher prices are inflation.

The cost of this deception goes well beyond the vilification of the oil industry and free markets. The real price of the on-going debauchery of the dollar is measured by the loss of our prosperity and the debasement of our liberty.

Neither the dollar, nor the price of individual items are fixed. Changes in the relative prices of goods and services occur because of technological change or shifts in supply or demand. The price of computers and televisions fall relative to the price of, well, just about everything. On the other hand, the freeze earlier this winter in Florida reduced the supply of oranges, leading to an increase in the price of orange juice. But, the value of the dollar also changes, usually in ways that are imperceptible over short periods of time. As a consequence, when the dollar price of gasoline rises 6% in a month, as it did in February, it appears that the price of gasoline is up, rather than the value of the dollar is down.

To see more clearly how the price of the dollar has changed, it helps to view price changes over a 10 year period. Since 2002, the price of a barrel of oil has increased four-fold, to $107 last Friday from $26 in 2002. To suggest that oil companies had enough power to impose such a price increase, or that speculators are responsible for a quadrupling of the price of oil is, on its face, preposterous. Instead, the price of oil and gasoline are up because the Federal Reserve has driven the value of the dollar down.

For example, if the dollar since 2002 had been as good as the:

  • Chinese yuan, the price of oil today would be $82 and a gallon of regular gas would cost about $3.10;
  • Euro, the price of oil today would be $77 and regular gas would cost about $2.90;
  • Japanese yen, the price of oil today would be $71 and regular gas would cost about $2.75;
  • Swiss Franc, the price of oil today would be $63 and regular gas would cost about $2.50.

Thanks Mr. Bernanke!

Regards,

Charles Kadlec
for The Daily Reckoning

The Rising Price of a Falling Dollar originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas. Recently Agora Financial released a video titled “What is Fracking?“.

Read more posts on The Daily Reckoning »

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Go to Source

23 Stock Markets That Put The US To Shame

Below is an updated snapshot of 2012 equity market returns for 78 countries around the world.  Of the 78 countries shown, 64 are in positive territory for the year, while 14 are in the red.  The average YTD percentage change for all countries shown is 7.11%.  Of the G7 countries, Japan, Germany and the US are outperforming the overall average.

Four of the G7 countries are significantly underperforming the average.  The UK and Canada are currently up just over 1% year to date, France is up just 0.93%, and Italy is down 4.84%.  Spain has been the worst of any country in 2012 with a year to date decline of 15.36%. 

world market gains

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

Go to Source

It’s a New World, and America Is Not Leading It

I’ve followed Chris Mayer’s work for many years, and come to admire his capacity for seeing around corners with unusual prescience. He was warning of a housing bust, and explained precisely how it would play itself out, fully two years before the reality dawned on everyone else.

Here is why I think his new book, World Right Side Up, is important. In the last decade, something astonishing has happened that has escaped the attention of nearly every American citizen. In the past, and with good reason, we were inclined to imagine that if we were living here, we were living everywhere. We were used to being ahead. The trends of the world would follow us, so there wasn’t really much point in paying that close attention. This national myopia has long been an affliction, but one without much cost. Until very recently.

One symptom of the change is that it used to be that the dollars in your local savings account or stock fund paid you money. The smart person saved and got rewarded. It seemed like the American thing to do. It is slowly dawning on people that this isn’t working anymore. Saving alone no longer pays, thanks largely to a Federal Reserve policy of zero-percent interest.

But that’s not the only reason. There’s something more fundamental going on, something that Mayer believes is going to continue for the rest of our lifetimes and beyond. The implications of his thesis are profound for investors. It actually affects the lives of everyone in the digital age.

Mayer points out that sometime in the last 10 years, the world economy doubled in size at the same time the balance of the world’s emerging wealth shifted away from the United States and toward all various parts of the world. The gap between us and them began to narrow. The world’s emerging markets began to make up half the global economy.

When you look at a graph of the US’s slice of global productivity, it is a sizable slice, taking up 21 percent, but it is nothing particularly amazing. Meanwhile, emerging markets make up 10 of the 20 largest economies in the world. India is gigantic, larger than Germany. Russia, which was a basket case in my living memory, has passed the UK. Turkey (who even talks about this country?) is larger than Australia. China might already be bigger than the United States.

Check these growth rates I pulled from the latest data, and compare to the US’s pathetic numbers: Malaysia and Malawi: 7.1%; Nicaragua: 7.6%; Dominican Republic 7.8%; Sri Lanka: 8.0%; Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Brazil, and Peru: 8.5%; India: 8.8%; Turkey and Turkmenistan: 9%; China: 10%; Singapore and Paraguay: 14.9%.

Then there’s the measure of the credit-default swap rating, which is a kind of insurance against default. The French rate is higher than Brazilian, Peruvian and Colombian debt. In the last 10 years, the stock markets of those Latin American countries far outperformed European stock markets. Also, many emerging economies are just better managed than the heavily bureaucratized, debt-laden economic landscape of the US and Europe. As for consumption, emerging markets have already surpassed the United States.

“These trends,” writes Mayer, “will become more pronounced over time. The creation of new markets, the influx of hundreds of millions of people who will want cellphones and air conditioners and water filters, who will want to eat a more varied diet of meats and fruits and vegetables, among many other things, will have a tremendous impact on world markets.”

Why does he see the trends as creating a “world right side up”? Because, he argues, this represents a kind of normalization of the globe in a post-US empire world. The Cold War was a grave distortion. In fact, the whole of the 20th century was a distortion too. Going back further, back to 1,000 years ago, we find a China that was far advanced over Western Europe.

I read Mayer’s prognostications with an attentive ear, for several reasons. His book is not the result of thousands of hours of Internet surfing or cribbing from the CIA World Factbook. He is an on-the-ground reporter who will go anywhere and do anything for a story about emerging wealth. The result is the kind of credibility that can’t be gained any other way.

But there is another reason. Mayer is often cited as one of a handful of people who saw what was happening in the housing market in the mid-2000s and issued several lengthy and detailed warnings. Not only did he foresee the bust, but he explained why the boom was taking place. He saw a perfect storm brewing with a combination of subsidized loans, too-big-to-fail mortgage agencies and a Federal Reserve policy that was designed to distort capital flows. He called it like few others.

This is not because he is a magic man. It is because he is schooled in solid economic theory — this becomes obvious in page after page — and also because he is intensely curious to discover the workings of that theory in the real world. In his way of thinking, if we can’t understand or expect change, we can’t understand markets, much less anticipate their direction.

Another thing: Mayer is less interested in big aggregates like GDP (and other such “economic monstrosities”) and more interested in taking a “boots-on-the ground view, a firsthand look.” His aim: “stay close to what is happening and what we can understand in more tangible ways.” And he seems close to everything: cement factories, the hotel industry, ranches and farms, coal and cellphone companies, financial houses, glassmakers, water purification companies — all the stuff that makes up life itself.

And what he discovers again and again are localized institutions that are cooperating globally (trade!) to build capital, wealth and new sources of progress that no one planned and hardly anyone anticipated. Here is the story of the building of civilization as it has always happened in history, but tracked carefully and precisely in our times.

In this book, he uses this combination of smarts plus fanatical curiosity to examine all the main contenders for the future: Colombia, Brazil, Nicaragua, China, India, the UAE, Syria, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, Mongolia, Argentina, Russia, Turkey, central Asia, Mexico and Canada. Here he finds innovation, capital, entrepreneurship, creativity, a willingness to try ideas and a passion for improving the lot of mankind.

His reporting defies conventional wisdom at every turn. Page after page, the reader will find himself thinking, That’s amazing. Nicaragua is not socialist. Medellín, Colombia (the “city of eternal spring”), is not violent. Brazil is no longer a land of rich and poor, but rather home to the world’s largest middle class. China is the world’s largest market for cars and cellphones; even in the rural areas you can buy Coke and a Snickers bar. India is the world’s leader in minting new millionaires. Cambodia (Cambodia!) ranks among the world’s most powerful magnets for investment capital. Mongolia has one of the world’s best-performing stock markets.

He also discovers many large American companies that have seen the writing on the wall and opened up factories, manufacturing plants, financial services and retail shops all over emerging markets. These companies are attracted by the intelligence of the workers, the relatively unregulated and low-tax legal environment and the cultures that have a new love for enterprise. And the returns are there too. The bottom line is sending a signal for them to expand.

It’s particularly intriguing to read about how all these emerging-market entrepreneurs overcome terrible and destructive bureaucracies — they exist everywhere! — that try to gum up the works, as well as bureaucrats who know nothing of business yet have the power to kill it off. Yet their very inefficiency is the saving grace. They can’t control the future. The brilliance of the market somehow finds the workaround.

Mayer’s main interest is in finding investment opportunities, and he lays them out in great detail here. If you think about it, this is just about the best vantage point from which to examine a new and unfamiliar world. Commerce is the driving force of history, the road map of where we’ve been and where we are going. To track down the profitable trade is likely to provide more valuable insight than all the academic speculations.

This is a very exciting book. It weaves history, geography, economics and firsthand reporting into a marvelous tapestry, one that is as beautiful as art and as complex and varied as the world itself has become in our times. A fine stylist, Mayer offers some fantastic one-liners in every section (“Change is like a pin to the balloons of conventional wisdom”) and his detailed stories give you the sense that you are traveling alongside him, like walking with Virgil in Purgatorio and Paradiso in one trip.

Mayer quotes Marco Polo: “I have not told half of what I saw.” In the same way, I’ve not told even 5 percent of what’s in this extraordinary tour of the world most people don’t know has come to exist only in the new millennium. There is no way a short review can do this book justice. There is so much wisdom packed in its pages. It is a meaty and enormously credible look at a world most people have never seen. In ten or twenty years, people will point to this book and say: this guy chronicled and understood what few others did.

Regards,

Jeffrey Tucker

Executive Editor Laissez Faire Books for The Daily Reckoning

It’s a New World, and America Is Not Leading It originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas. Recently Agora Financial released a video titled “What is Fracking?“.

Read more posts on The Daily Reckoning »

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Go to Source